AI & ChatGPT searches , social queries for OVERBREADTH DOCTRINE
Search references for OVERBREADTH DOCTRINE. Phrases containing OVERBREADTH DOCTRINE
See searches and references containing OVERBREADTH DOCTRINE!
Search references for OVERBREADTH DOCTRINE. Phrases containing OVERBREADTH DOCTRINE
See searches and references containing OVERBREADTH DOCTRINE!OVERBREADTH DOCTRINE
U.S. First Amendment jurisprudential doctrine
jurisprudence, the overbreadth doctrine is primarily concerned with facial challenges to laws under the First Amendment. The overbreadth doctrine is used to find
Overbreadth_doctrine
Concept in American constitutional law
liability. Indeterminacy debate in legal theory Legal certainty Overbreadth doctrine Plain Language Movement Rule according to higher law "Papachristou
Vagueness_doctrine
American law to regulate bulk e-mail
AGAINST UNSOLICITED E-MAIL IN LIGHT OF THE CAN-SPAM ACT AND THE OVERBREADTH DOCTRINE" (PDF). Boston College Law Review. Archived from the original (PDF)
CAN-SPAM_Act_of_2003
American law professor
School, where he both named and first analyzed the First Amendment "overbreadth doctrine" in a student note. He co-authored the popular tort law casebook
Lewis_Sargentich
Challenge in U.S. constitutional law
Amendment cases, another type of facial challenge is enunciated in the overbreadth doctrine. If a statute reaches to include substantially protected conduct
Facial_challenge
1967 United States Supreme Court case
Zwickler v. Koota, 389 U.S. 241 (1967) Lieberman, Jethro K. (1999). "Overbreadth Doctrine". A Practical Companion to the Constitution. p. 338. Text of Zwickler
Zwickler_v._Koota
States v. Sineneng-Smith 590 U.S. ___ (2020) First Amendment • overbreadth doctrine Ginsburg 118 GE Energy Power Conversion France SAS v. Outokumpu Stainless
2019 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Clarence Thomas
2019_term_United_States_Supreme_Court_opinions_of_Clarence_Thomas
S. ___ (2020) party presentation principle • First Amendment • overbreadth doctrine • induced violation for profit of immigration law Unanimous Thomas
2019 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Ruth Bader Ginsburg
2019_term_United_States_Supreme_Court_opinions_of_Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
state legislator with conflict of interest • First Amendment • overbreadth doctrine Scalia Alito 112 Bond v. United States 564 U.S. 211 (2011) Article
2010 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Anthony Kennedy
2010_term_United_States_Supreme_Court_opinions_of_Anthony_Kennedy
state legislator with conflict of interest • First Amendment • overbreadth doctrine Scalia Kennedy 117 United States v. Jicarilla Apache Nation 564 U
2010 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Samuel Alito
2010_term_United_States_Supreme_Court_opinions_of_Samuel_Alito
1987 United States Supreme Court case
would be valid. The Court, however, recognized the well-established overbreadth doctrine, which provides a different standard for facial challenges of laws
United_States_v._Salerno
Section 2257 are constitutional, and in its extended discussion of the overbreadth doctrine. The decision has been strongly criticized by the adult entertainment
Connection Distributing Co. v. Holder
Connection_Distributing_Co._v._Holder
Safe driving distance between cars
convert km/h to m/s or π/180 to convert deg to requisite rad). The overbreadth doctrine is also implicated whereby to avoid the risk of legal consequences
Assured_clear_distance_ahead
1982 United States Supreme Court case
United States Supreme Court decision concerning the vagueness and overbreadth doctrines as they apply to restrictions on commercial speech. The justices
Hoffman Estates v. The Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.
Hoffman_Estates_v._The_Flipside,_Hoffman_Estates,_Inc.
state legislator with conflict of interest • First Amendment • overbreadth doctrine Roberts, Kennedy, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan Kennedy
2010 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Antonin Scalia
2010_term_United_States_Supreme_Court_opinions_of_Antonin_Scalia
1974 U.S. Supreme Court case
no answer at all" for it misunderstood how the overbreadth doctrine is applied. The focus of the doctrine is not on the individual actor before the court
Arnett_v._Kennedy
against unsolicited e-mail in light of the CAN-SPAM Act and the overbreadth doctrine The CAN-SPAM Act of 2003: A False Hope The Effectiveness of Litigation
Omega World Travel, Inc. v. Mummagraphics, Inc.
Omega_World_Travel,_Inc._v._Mummagraphics,_Inc.
1999 United States Supreme Court case
although in the past, it had allowed overbreadth challenges based on the First Amendment in the past, the overbreadth doctrine was “strong medicine” and “should
Los Angeles Police Department v. United Reporting Publishing Corp.
Los_Angeles_Police_Department_v._United_Reporting_Publishing_Corp.
2020 United States Supreme Court case
courts. Justice Clarence Thomas filed a concurrence concerning the overbreadth doctrine relied on by the Ninth Circuit, which he thought should be revisited
United States v. Sineneng-Smith
United_States_v._Sineneng-Smith
2023 United States Supreme Court case
would not meet the elements of the crime. The court applied the overbreadth doctrine as expressed in United States v. Williams (2008): a law is unconstitutional
United_States_v._Hansen
American judge (born 1961)
violating his equal-protection rights; the void-for-vagueness and overbreadth doctrines by failing to give fair notice of prohibited conduct and by overly
Mark_Massa
2025 executive order in the United States
restrictions on speech that would not satisfy strict scrutiny due to overbreadth and vagueness, and that a legally enforceable "objectivity and balance"
Executive_Order_14290
Estates v. The Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc. 455 U.S. 498 (1982) Overbreadth doctrine does not apply to commercial speech Rose v. Lundy 455 U.S. 509 (1982)
List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Burger Court
List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_by_the_Burger_Court
Legal concept
example, courts will accept First Amendment challenges to a statute on overbreadth grounds, where a person who is only partially affected by a statute can
Standing_(law)
Speech or writing intended to incite hatred or violence
would tend to incite an immediate breach of the peace. The fighting words doctrine, in United States constitutional law, is a limitation to freedom of speech
Fighting_words
American legal doctrine
vagueness and overbreadth problems than the definition of indecency. — Levy 2008 Legal scholars have questioned the constitutionality of the doctrine, and indicated
Actionable_indecency
Commonly applied method of evaluation used to resolve matters of jurisprudence
test Law test Multiple Access test Necessarily incidental doctrine Oakes test Overbreadth test Patent unreasonableness test Pith and substance test (see
Test_(law)
1973 United States Supreme Court case
Broadrick is often cited to enunciate the test for a facial overbreadth challenge that "the overbreadth of a statute must not only be real, but substantial as
Broadrick_v._Oklahoma
Harv. L. Rev. 423 (1974). But see Monaghan, Overbreadth, 1981 Sup. Ct. Rev. 1 (arguing that overbreadth involves first-party, not third-party standing
Third-party_standing
Whether a court can or cannot rule upon something
their assigned claims, and finally, in the context of First Amendment overbreadth challenges, the pursuit of claims involving the rights of potentially
Justiciability
2023 United States Supreme Court case
act exposed the case to First Amendment review under the true threats doctrine because the proven criminal act involved only speech. The Colorado Court
Counterman_v._Colorado
2001 United States Supreme Court case
should not impede Murphy's ability to raise the issue of vagueness and overbreadth again. Shaw v. Murphy, 532 U.S. 223 (2001). Turner v. Safley, 482 U.S
Shaw_v._Murphy
1972 United States Supreme Court case
Poulos, Chicago's Ban on Gang Loitering: Making Sense of Vagueness and Overbreadth in Loitering Laws, 83 Calif. L. Rev. 379 (1995). Joel D. Berg, The Troubled
Papachristou v. City of Jacksonville
Papachristou_v._City_of_Jacksonville
Arrest or prosecution done to punish the exercising of civil rights
justifiable police conduct. Canadian courts recognize the abuse of process doctrine, which addresses prosecutorial misconduct, including retaliatory prosecutions
Retaliatory arrest and prosecution
Retaliatory_arrest_and_prosecution
2008 United States Supreme Court case
the Eleventh Circuit's ruling that the statute was facially void for overbreadth and vagueness. The Supreme Court reasoned that there is no First Amendment
United States v. Williams (2008)
United_States_v._Williams_(2008)
1992 United States Supreme Court case
motion, but the Minnesota Supreme Court reversed, rejecting petitioner's overbreadth claim because, as the Court had construed the ordinance in prior cases
R.A.V._v._City_of_St._Paul
United States first amendment case
Law Project (2010) Williams-Yulee v. Florida Bar (2015) Overbreadth and Vagueness doctrines Terminiello v. City of Chicago (1949) Smith v. Goguen (1974)
Murthy_v._Missouri
Threat that is not protected speech under US law
regarded as a "true threat" due to concern over terrorism. The true threat doctrine was established in the 1969 Supreme Court case Watts v. United States.
True_threat
US federal law
racketeering activity. After the defendants moved to dismiss the indictment for overbreadth and vagueness, the grand jury returned a superseding indictment on February
Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act
Racketeer_Influenced_and_Corrupt_Organizations_Act
Designated space for public expression in the United States
speech of ordinary citizens to further its goals, the government speech doctrine blocks citizens' First Amendment claims that the government set up a forum
Forum_(legal)
1987 United States Supreme Court case
Angeles International Airport was facially unconstitutional due to its overbreadth. In July 1984, Howard Snyder, a minister with the organization Jews for
Board of Airport Commissioners of Los Angeles v. Jews for Jesus, Inc.
Board_of_Airport_Commissioners_of_Los_Angeles_v._Jews_for_Jesus,_Inc.
1952 Supreme Court of the United States case on freedom of speech
ISBN 0-87081-285-8. LCCN 92040157. Nathan, Debbie (21 March 2025). "The Insidious Doctrine Fueling the Case Against Mahmoud Khalil". Boston Review. Retrieved 31 March
Harisiades_v._Shaughnessy
1942 United States Supreme Court case
of the United States in which the Court articulated the fighting words doctrine, a limitation of the First Amendment's guarantee of freedom of speech.
Chaplinsky_v._New_Hampshire
US Supreme Court decision (2012)
Law Project (2010) Williams-Yulee v. Florida Bar (2015) Overbreadth and Vagueness doctrines Terminiello v. City of Chicago (1949) Smith v. Goguen (1974)
United_States_v._Alvarez
2025 United States Supreme Court case
Law Project (2010) Williams-Yulee v. Florida Bar (2015) Overbreadth and Vagueness doctrines Terminiello v. City of Chicago (1949) Smith v. Goguen (1974)
Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton
Free_Speech_Coalition_v._Paxton
2025 U.S. Supreme Court decision
Law Project (2010) Williams-Yulee v. Florida Bar (2015) Overbreadth and Vagueness doctrines Terminiello v. City of Chicago (1949) Smith v. Goguen (1974)
TikTok,_Inc._v._Garland
1969 United States Supreme Court case
Amendment remained in force: advocacy of law violation, even as an abstract doctrine, could be punished under law consistent with the free speech clause. The
Brandenburg_v._Ohio
2011 United States Supreme Court case
Law Project (2010) Williams-Yulee v. Florida Bar (2015) Overbreadth and Vagueness doctrines Terminiello v. City of Chicago (1949) Smith v. Goguen (1974)
Sorrell_v._IMS_Health_Inc.
2024 United States Supreme Court case
Law Project (2010) Williams-Yulee v. Florida Bar (2015) Overbreadth and Vagueness doctrines Terminiello v. City of Chicago (1949) Smith v. Goguen (1974)
Lindke_v._Freed
Free speech doctrine in US constitutional law
Clear and present danger was a doctrine adopted by the Supreme Court of the United States to determine under what circumstances limits can be placed on
Clear_and_present_danger
2024 United States Supreme Court case
Law Project (2010) Williams-Yulee v. Florida Bar (2015) Overbreadth and Vagueness doctrines Terminiello v. City of Chicago (1949) Smith v. Goguen (1974)
National Rifle Association of America v. Vullo
National_Rifle_Association_of_America_v._Vullo
2003 United States Supreme Court case
unconstitutional free speech restrictions, largely due to vagueness and overbreadth issues that caused those statutes to fail the strict scrutiny test. CIPA
United States v. American Library Ass'n
United_States_v._American_Library_Ass'n
1971 United States Supreme Court case
Law Project (2010) Williams-Yulee v. Florida Bar (2015) Overbreadth and Vagueness doctrines Terminiello v. City of Chicago (1949) Smith v. Goguen (1974)
Coates_v._City_of_Cincinnati
Categories of free speech not protected by the First Amendment
restriction supports that interest as well as not being overly broad. This doctrine of limited protection for advertisements is due to a balancing inherent
United States free speech exceptions
United_States_free_speech_exceptions
2001 United States Supreme Court case
"entwinement" standard for determining state action, which he said "stretched the doctrine beyond its permissible limits." He attacked the majority's decision as
Brentwood Academy v. Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Ass'n
Brentwood_Academy_v._Tennessee_Secondary_School_Athletic_Ass'n
2002 United States Supreme Court case
their legitimate work. The district court disagreed, adding that the overbreadth claim was specious as it was "highly unlikely" that any "adaptations
Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition
Ashcroft_v._Free_Speech_Coalition
Regulates or suppresses obscenity
and Miller to explain or justify the doctrine, the Supreme Court was simply wrong on the issue and the doctrine should be wholly discarded. Obscenity
United_States_obscenity_law
2010 U.S. Supreme Court decision
Law Project (2010) Williams-Yulee v. Florida Bar (2015) Overbreadth and Vagueness doctrines Terminiello v. City of Chicago (1949) Smith v. Goguen (1974)
Citizens_United_v._FEC
2024 United States Supreme Court case
Law Project (2010) Williams-Yulee v. Florida Bar (2015) Overbreadth and Vagueness doctrines Terminiello v. City of Chicago (1949) Smith v. Goguen (1974)
Moody_v._NetChoice,_LLC
2024 United States Supreme Court case
Law Project (2010) Williams-Yulee v. Florida Bar (2015) Overbreadth and Vagueness doctrines Terminiello v. City of Chicago (1949) Smith v. Goguen (1974)
Gonzalez_v._Trevino
US Supreme Court justice from 1994 to 2022
military awards as restrictions on political speech that should fail for overbreadth. In comparison, his dissent in Sorrell v. IMS Health Inc. (2011) argued
Stephen_Breyer
The government speech doctrine, in American constitutional law, says that the government is not infringing the free speech rights of individual people
Government_speech
1957 United States Supreme Court case
prohibit "advocacy of the forcible overthrow of the government as an abstract doctrine". The Court recognized that "advocacy to action" circumstances would be
Yates_v._United_States
2026 U.S. Supreme Court decision
Law Project (2010) Williams-Yulee v. Florida Bar (2015) Overbreadth and Vagueness doctrines Terminiello v. City of Chicago (1949) Smith v. Goguen (1974)
National Republican Senatorial Committee v. FEC
National_Republican_Senatorial_Committee_v._FEC
1988 United States Supreme Court case
Law Project (2010) Williams-Yulee v. Florida Bar (2015) Overbreadth and Vagueness doctrines Terminiello v. City of Chicago (1949) Smith v. Goguen (1974)
Hustler_Magazine_v._Falwell
1988 United States Supreme Court case
Law Project (2010) Williams-Yulee v. Florida Bar (2015) Overbreadth and Vagueness doctrines Terminiello v. City of Chicago (1949) Smith v. Goguen (1974)
Boos_v._Barry
1925 United States Supreme Court case
erroneous doctrine of Government." Gitlow was later briefly elected General Secretary of the American Communist Party in 1929. The Court used the doctrine first
Gitlow_v._New_York
1943 United States Supreme Court case
Law Project (2010) Williams-Yulee v. Florida Bar (2015) Overbreadth and Vagueness doctrines Terminiello v. City of Chicago (1949) Smith v. Goguen (1974)
West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette
West_Virginia_State_Board_of_Education_v._Barnette
2007 U.S. Supreme Court case on student speech
the speech rights of adults outside school. Second, the "school speech" doctrine applied because Frederick's speech occurred at a school-supervised event
Morse_v._Frederick
2022 United States Supreme Court case
Law Project (2010) Williams-Yulee v. Florida Bar (2015) Overbreadth and Vagueness doctrines Terminiello v. City of Chicago (1949) Smith v. Goguen (1974)
Kennedy v. Bremerton School District
Kennedy_v._Bremerton_School_District
1969 United States Supreme Court case
students in a journalism class. The Court in Hazelwood said that under the doctrine of Perry Education Association v. Perry Local Educators Association, a
Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District
Tinker_v._Des_Moines_Independent_Community_School_District
1950 United States Supreme Court case
Law Project (2010) Williams-Yulee v. Florida Bar (2015) Overbreadth and Vagueness doctrines Terminiello v. City of Chicago (1949) Smith v. Goguen (1974)
American Communications Ass'n v. Douds
American_Communications_Ass'n_v._Douds
1977 United States Supreme Court case
Law Project (2010) Williams-Yulee v. Florida Bar (2015) Overbreadth and Vagueness doctrines Terminiello v. City of Chicago (1949) Smith v. Goguen (1974)
National Socialist Party of America v. Village of Skokie
National_Socialist_Party_of_America_v._Village_of_Skokie
Transmission of expression required by law
Law Project (2010) Williams-Yulee v. Florida Bar (2015) Overbreadth and Vagueness doctrines Terminiello v. City of Chicago (1949) Smith v. Goguen (1974)
Compelled_speech
1968 United States Supreme Court case
held that the nexus need merely be reasonable. The court also merged its doctrine of time-place-manner restrictions and the O'Brien test into an intermediate
United_States_v._O'Brien
Legislation restricting certain breeds of dog
court's ruling: It agreed with the lower court judge in finding that the "overbreadth" claim failed because the legislature had acted on a "reasonable apprehension
Breed-specific_legislation
1997 United States Supreme Court case
Law Project (2010) Williams-Yulee v. Florida Bar (2015) Overbreadth and Vagueness doctrines Terminiello v. City of Chicago (1949) Smith v. Goguen (1974)
Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union
Reno_v._American_Civil_Liberties_Union
1977 United States Supreme Court case
administrators still were under protection of the "hands-off" doctrine. This doctrine stated that the federal government would not intervene in constitutional
Jones v. North Carolina Prisoners' Labor Union
Jones_v._North_Carolina_Prisoners'_Labor_Union
the affairs of men". However, in Moore's view this did not violate the doctrine of separation of church and state; as the presiding judge later summarized
Glassroth_v._Moore
2024 United States Supreme Court case
Law Project (2010) Williams-Yulee v. Florida Bar (2015) Overbreadth and Vagueness doctrines Terminiello v. City of Chicago (1949) Smith v. Goguen (1974)
Vidal_v._Elster
1978 United States Supreme Court case
Constitutional protection for commercial speech was a relatively new doctrine, with three major cases having been decided in the previous five years
Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Ass'n
Ohralik_v._Ohio_State_Bar_Ass'n
Supreme Court of Canada case
This is the language of the Constitution, and avoids the potential overbreadth of focusing on the maritime writ large. SCC, par. 148 The minority held
Desgagnés Transport Inc v Wärtsilä Canada Inc
Desgagnés_Transport_Inc_v_Wärtsilä_Canada_Inc
1973 U.S. Supreme Court case on obscenity
Law Project (2010) Williams-Yulee v. Florida Bar (2015) Overbreadth and Vagueness doctrines Terminiello v. City of Chicago (1949) Smith v. Goguen (1974)
Miller_v._California
2015 United States Supreme Court case
Law Project (2010) Williams-Yulee v. Florida Bar (2015) Overbreadth and Vagueness doctrines Terminiello v. City of Chicago (1949) Smith v. Goguen (1974)
Elonis_v._United_States
1995 United States Supreme Court case
restriction on lawyer advertising under the First Amendment's commercial speech doctrine. In 1989, the Florida Bar completed a two-year survey of public opinion
Florida Bar v. Went For It, Inc.
Florida_Bar_v._Went_For_It,_Inc.
Limitation on freedom of speech in the US
the case. Opinion privilege has its roots in the common law fair comment doctrine. Opinion based on fact is not protected qua opinion, if the opinion is
United_States_defamation_law
1951 United States Supreme Court case
basis of Congress' or our own notions of mere "reasonableness." Such a doctrine waters down the First Amendment so that it amounts to little more than
Dennis_v._United_States
1986 United States Supreme Court case
earlier reasoning" and that "Albertini simply does not reflect current doctrine following Arcara." Scholars looked for explanations beyond the Arcara rule
Arcara_v._Cloud_Books,_Inc.
1919 United States Supreme Court case
Law Project (2010) Williams-Yulee v. Florida Bar (2015) Overbreadth and Vagueness doctrines Terminiello v. City of Chicago (1949) Smith v. Goguen (1974)
Schenck_v._United_States
Free speech doctrine in US Constitutional law
Law Project (2010) Williams-Yulee v. Florida Bar (2015) Overbreadth and Vagueness doctrines Terminiello v. City of Chicago (1949) Smith v. Goguen (1974)
Imminent_lawless_action
1957 U.S. Supreme Court case
Law Project (2010) Williams-Yulee v. Florida Bar (2015) Overbreadth and Vagueness doctrines Terminiello v. City of Chicago (1949) Smith v. Goguen (1974)
Roth_v._United_States
1998 United States Supreme Court case
Law Project (2010) Williams-Yulee v. Florida Bar (2015) Overbreadth and Vagueness doctrines Terminiello v. City of Chicago (1949) Smith v. Goguen (1974)
Arkansas Educational Television Commission v. Forbes
Arkansas_Educational_Television_Commission_v._Forbes
2023 U.S. Supreme Court case on free speech
Law Project (2010) Williams-Yulee v. Florida Bar (2015) Overbreadth and Vagueness doctrines Terminiello v. City of Chicago (1949) Smith v. Goguen (1974)
303_Creative_LLC_v._Elenis
2011 United States Supreme Court case
service itself." The decision also declined to expand the "captive audience doctrine", saying that Snyder was not in a state where he was coerced to hear the
Snyder_v._Phelps
1979 United States Supreme Court case
Law Project (2010) Williams-Yulee v. Florida Bar (2015) Overbreadth and Vagueness doctrines Terminiello v. City of Chicago (1949) Smith v. Goguen (1974)
Friedman_v._Rogers
Crime in the United States
Law Project (2010) Williams-Yulee v. Florida Bar (2015) Overbreadth and Vagueness doctrines Terminiello v. City of Chicago (1949) Smith v. Goguen (1974)
Threatening the president of the United States
Threatening_the_president_of_the_United_States
1940 United States Supreme Court case
said that he would not do it. While the matter was not yet established doctrine or written policy of Jehovah's Witnesses, at least some Witness families
Minersville School District v. Gobitis
Minersville_School_District_v._Gobitis
1971 U.S. Supreme Court case on freedom of speech and public civility
Law Project (2010) Williams-Yulee v. Florida Bar (2015) Overbreadth and Vagueness doctrines Terminiello v. City of Chicago (1949) Smith v. Goguen (1974)
Cohen_v._California
1985 United States Supreme Court case
Law Project (2010) Williams-Yulee v. Florida Bar (2015) Overbreadth and Vagueness doctrines Terminiello v. City of Chicago (1949) Smith v. Goguen (1974)
Cornelius v. NAACP Legal Defense Fund
Cornelius_v._NAACP_Legal_Defense_Fund
1965 United States Supreme Court case
JSTOR 3479402. Verani, John R. (1965). "Motion Picture Censorship and the Doctrine of Prior Restraint". Houston Law Review. 3: 11. Text of Freedman v. Maryland
Freedman_v._Maryland
OVERBREADTH DOCTRINE
OVERBREADTH DOCTRINE
Surname or Lastname
English (Devon)
English (Devon) : topographic name for someone who lived ‘at the end of the cottages’, from Middle English, Old English ende ‘end’ + cot ‘cottage’. One locality so named is Endicott in Cadbury, Devon; another is now called Youngcott, in Milton Abbot.John Endecott (1588–1665) was a prominent figure in the early history of MA, being one of the founding fathers of Salem, MA, in 1638. He served as governor of Massachusetts Bay Colony (1629–30), and worked harmoniously with his successor, John Winthrop, despite differences on points of religious doctrine. He served as governor again in 1644–45, 1649–50, 1651–54, and 1655–64, and as deputy governor in many of the intervening years. He is buried in the King’s Chapel Burying Ground in Boston.
Male
Spanish
Said to have been derived from Spanish Santiago ("St. James"), but in the Middle Ages Diego existed in the Latin forms Didacus and Didagus, causing some scholars to suspect that Diego may have originally derived from the Greek word didakhe, DIEGO means "doctrine, teaching."Â
Girl/Female
Australian, Chinese, Japanese
Doctrine Child
Boy/Male
Australian, Portuguese
Superior; Doctrine; Teaching
Girl/Female
Australian, Japanese
Doctrine
Boy/Male
Indian, Sanskrit
Doctrine of Unity; Worldly Wisdom
Male
Portuguese
Portuguese form of Spanish Diego, DIOGO means either "St. James," or "doctrine, teaching."
Girl/Female
Arabic, Indian, Kannada, Malayalam, Muslim, Parsi, Tamil
Happiness; Cheerfulness; Teaching; Doctrine
Boy/Male
Buddhist, Indian, Sanskrit
Follower of Buddhist Doctrine
Boy/Male
Hindu, Indian, Marathi
The Doctrine of Unity; Worldly Wisdom
Surname or Lastname
English
English : habitational name from a place in Lancashire, so named from Old English gor ‘dirt’, ‘mud’ + tūn ‘enclosure’, ‘settlement’.Introduced in America by a family from Gorton, Lancashire, England (three miles from Manchester), the name Gorton was also adopted by a religious group known as the Gortonites. They were followers of Samuel Gorton (c. 1592–1677), whose unorthodox religious beliefs, which included denying the doctrine of the Trinity, caused him to seek religious toleration by emigrating to Boston in 1637 with his family. In conflict with authorities in Massachusetts Bay, Plymouth, and Newport, he eventually settled in Shawomet, RI, and renamed it Warwick. He died there in 1677, leaving three sons and at least six daughters.
OVERBREADTH DOCTRINE
OVERBREADTH DOCTRINE
OVERBREADTH DOCTRINE
OVERBREADTH DOCTRINE
OVERBREADTH DOCTRINE
OVERBREADTH DOCTRINE
OVERBREADTH DOCTRINE