AI & ChatGPT searches , social queriess for CONCURRENCE
Search references for CONCURRENCE. Phrases containing CONCURRENCE
See searches and references containing CONCURRENCE!
Search references for CONCURRENCE. Phrases containing CONCURRENCE
See searches and references containing CONCURRENCE!CONCURRENCE
Simultaneity of actus reus and mens rea
In Western jurisprudence, concurrence (also contemporaneity or simultaneity) is the apparent need to prove the simultaneous occurrence of both actus reus
Concurrence
State invariant involving qubits
In quantum information science, the concurrence is a state invariant involving qubits. The concurrence is an entanglement monotone (a way of measuring
Concurrence (quantum computing)
Concurrence_(quantum_computing)
Physics of the cause–effect relation
In physics, causality requires the cause of an event to be in the past light cone of the result and to be ultimately reducible to fundamental interactions
Causality_(physics)
Topics referred to by the same term
concurrent, or concurrence in Wiktionary, the free dictionary. Concurrent means happening at the same time. Concurrency, concurrent, or concurrence may refer
Concurrency
October 2025 to October 2026 opinions
court's opinion Filed a concurrence Joined a concurrence Filed a dissent Joined a dissent Filed a concurrence/dissent Joined a concurrence/dissent Filed a statement
2025 term opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States
2025_term_opinions_of_the_Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
English criminal law case
Police Commissioner (1968) is a leading case that confirms the need for concurrence (or coincidence) of actus reus (Latin for "guilty act") and mens rea
Fagan v Metropolitan Police Commissioner
Fagan_v_Metropolitan_Police_Commissioner
Competition regulator in France
The Autorité de la concurrence (French for 'Competition Authority'; French: [ɔtɔʁite də la kɔ̃kyʁɑ̃s]) is France's national competition regulator. Its
Autorité_de_la_concurrence
1946 United States Supreme Court case
the true importance behind a free press and Bridges v. California. His concurrence can be summarized as follows, "The precise issue is whether, and to what
Pennekamp_v._Florida
1972 U.S. Supreme Court case
the evolving standards of decency of a contemporary society. In his concurrence Justice Brennan said jury-imposed death sentences were relatively few
Furman_v._Georgia
Former law granting autonomy to Jammu and Kashmir
Central Government would be applied to Jammu and Kashmir only with the concurrence of the State's own constituent assembly. This was a "temporary provision"
Article 370 of the Constitution of India
Article_370_of_the_Constitution_of_India
Highest court of jurisdiction in the US
A justice may write an opinion in concurrence with the court, or they may write a dissent, and these concurrences or dissents may also be joined by other
Supreme Court of the United States
Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
Legal term
Meeting of the minds (also referred to as mutual agreement, mutual assent, or consensus ad idem) is a phrase in contract law used to describe the intentions
Meeting_of_the_minds
October 2024 to October 2025 opinions
court's opinion Filed a concurrence Joined a concurrence Filed a dissent Joined a dissent Filed a concurrence/dissent Joined a concurrence/dissent Filed a statement
2024 term opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States
2024_term_opinions_of_the_Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
National award in Philippines
trustees of the Rockefeller Brothers Fund based in New York City with the concurrence of the Philippine government. It is often called the "Nobel Prize of
Ramon_Magsaysay_Award
2001 United States Supreme Court case
act in question was entirely 'civil'. Justice Antonin Scalia wrote a concurrence in the decision of the majority with which Justice Souter joined. He
Seling_v._Young
Competition, Consumption & Repression of Frauds (Direction générale de la concurrence, de la consommation et de la répression des fraudes (DGCCRF)) regulates
Politics_of_France
2023 United States Supreme Court case
Clarence Thomas, joining the majority opinion in full, offered a separate concurrence in which he suggested revisiting prior cases recognizing the canons of
Arizona_v._Navajo_Nation
2014 United States Supreme Court case
Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan Concurrence Ginsburg, joined by Breyer, Sotomayor Concurrence Thomas (in judgment), joined by Scalia, Alito
Halliburton Co. v. Erica P. John Fund, Inc.
Halliburton_Co._v._Erica_P._John_Fund,_Inc.
Concurrence of events with no connection
A coincidence is a remarkable concurrence of events or circumstances that have no apparent causal connection with one another. The perception of remarkable
Coincidence
1981 United States Supreme Court case
P. Stevens Case opinions Majority Rehnquist,Burger, Stewart, Blackmun, Powell Concurrence Brennan Concurrence White Dissent Marshall Dissent Stevens
Postal Service v. Council of Greenburgh Civic Ass'ns
Postal_Service_v._Council_of_Greenburgh_Civic_Ass'ns
October 2021 to October 2022 opinions
court's opinion Filed a concurrence Joined a concurrence Filed a dissent Joined a dissent Filed a concurrence/dissent Joined a concurrence/dissent Filed a statement
2021 term opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States
2021_term_opinions_of_the_Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
Tractate of the Talmud
presumption of innocence and the rule that a criminal conviction requires the concurrence of twelve. Within Seder Nezikin, the Sanhedrin focuses on questions of
Sanhedrin_(tractate)
October 2022 to October 2023 opinions
court's opinion Filed a concurrence Joined a concurrence Filed a dissent Joined a dissent Filed a concurrence/dissent Joined a concurrence/dissent Filed a statement
2022 term opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States
2022_term_opinions_of_the_Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
October 2018 to October 2019 opinions
court's opinion Filed a concurrence Joined a concurrence Filed a dissent Joined a dissent Filed a concurrence/dissent Joined a concurrence/dissent Did not participate
2018 term opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States
2018_term_opinions_of_the_Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
United States obscenity law expression
"obscenity", he did not use the word "obscenity" himself in his short concurrence, but stated that he knew what fit the "shorthand description" of "hard-core
I_know_it_when_I_see_it
1947 United States Supreme Court case
decision in Twining v. New Jersey. Justice Felix Frankfurter wrote a concurrence arguing that incorporation of the Bill of Rights by the due process clause
Adamson_v._California
1952 United States Supreme Court case
concurred, joined by Associate Justice William O. Douglas. Frankfurter's concurrence provided a ringing defense of the special role teachers play in a democracy:
Wieman_v._Updegraff
1944 U.S. Supreme Court case upholding the internment of Japanese Americans
Japanese American must be released from detention. Justice Frankfurter's concurrence reads in its entirety: According to my reading of Civilian Exclusion
Korematsu_v._United_States
1967 United States Supreme Court case
certiorari. In Part I, not a part of the opinion because of the limited concurrence of Chief Justice Warren and Justice Douglas, Justice Brennan held that
United_States_v._Wade
1873 United States Supreme Court case
Case opinions Majority Miller, joined by Clifford, Davis, Strong, Hunt Concurrence Bradley, joined by Swayne, Field Dissent Chase Laws applied U.S. Const
Bradwell_v._Illinois
2013 landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court
defendants' right to remain silent during questioning and at trial. In his concurrence, Justice Thomas wrote that he would have gone further and held that,
Salinas_v._Texas
1949 United States Supreme Court case
of contracts that would bring it about. Justice Frankfurter wrote his concurrence on a single point, joining the court on all others. His main point was
Lincoln Union v. Northwestern Co.
Lincoln_Union_v._Northwestern_Co.
October 2023 to October 2024 opinions
court's opinion Filed a concurrence Joined a concurrence Filed a dissent Joined a dissent Filed a concurrence/dissent Joined a concurrence/dissent Filed a statement
2023 term opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States
2023_term_opinions_of_the_Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
1990 United States Supreme Court case
have misrepresented the Court's reasoning in Bertine. In Blackmun's concurrence, he agreed that a State could reasonably adopt a policy mandating the
Florida_v._Wells
Supreme Court of Canada case
Cartwright, Gerald Fauteux Reasons given Majority Cartwright J., joined by Rinfret C.J., Taschereau, Rand, Kellock, and Locke JJ. Concurrence Kerwin J.
Frey_v_Fedoruk
Upper house of the Congress of the Philippines
be submitted to the Senate for its concurrence after presidential signing. If the Senate withholds its concurrence (or votes to reject a treaty), the
Senate_of_the_Philippines
1978 United States Supreme Court case
separate one as well. Justices Stewart and Powell each wrote their own concurrence agreeing with the judgment of the court. Chief Justice Burger joined
Zablocki_v._Redhail
October 2019 to October 2020 opinions
court's opinion Filed a concurrence Joined a concurrence Filed a dissent Joined a dissent Filed a concurrence/dissent Joined a concurrence/dissent Filed a statement
2019 term opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States
2019_term_opinions_of_the_Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
1980 United States Supreme Court case
Majority Marshall, joined by Burger, Brennan, White, Blackmun, Powell Concurrence Powell Dissent Stevens, joined by Stewart, Rehnquist Laws applied U.S
White Mountain Apache Tribe v. Bracker
White_Mountain_Apache_Tribe_v._Bracker
1960 United States Supreme Court case
English Wikisource has original text related to this article: Commissioner Of Internal Revenue v. Duberstein Commissioner v. Duberstein, 363 U.S. 278 (1960)
Commissioner_v._Duberstein
1973 US Supreme Court decision on abortion, overruled 2022
wrote a concurrence stating Nebraska was actually banning both abortion methods. Justices Ginsburg and Stevens joined each other's concurrences. Justice
Roe_v._Wade
1984 United States Supreme Court case
opinions Majority Burger, joined by White, Powell, Rehnquist, O'Connor Concurrence O'Connor Dissent Brennan, joined by Marshall, Blackmun, Stevens Dissent
Lynch_v._Donnelly
1962 United States Supreme Court case
government interferes in matters spiritual, it will be a divisive force. The concurrence was highly criticized. Douglas argued that all religious exercise in
Engel_v._Vitale
2025 United States Supreme Court case
Kavanaugh filed concurrences. Justice Neil Gorsuch joined Thomas's concurrence and Thomas joined Alito's concurrence. Thomas's concurrence explicitly stated
Trump_v._CASA
Term for US law enforcement practice
contextual indicators. The term is associated with Justice Brett Kavanaugh's concurrence in Noem v. Vasquez Perdomo (2025), in which he stated that although apparent
Kavanaugh_stop
2018 U.S. Supreme Court case on free expression
United v. FEC 558 U.S. 310 (2010), and freedom of religion through his concurrence with the majority in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. 573 U.S. 682
Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission
Masterpiece_Cakeshop_v._Colorado_Civil_Rights_Commission
1948 United States Supreme Court case
joined by Black, Frankfurter, Douglas, Murphy, Rutledge Concurrence Black, joined by Douglas Concurrence Murphy, joined by Rutledge Dissent Reed, joined by
Oyama_v._California
2025 United States Supreme Court case
position, Gorsuch cited Thomas' concurrence in the 2011 case Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. Partnership. The concurrence was seen as protesting the landmark
E.M.D._Sales,_Inc._v._Carrera
1988 United States Supreme Court case
joined by Rehnquist, White, Scalia Concurrence Blackmun (in part and in judgment), joined by Brennan, Marshall Concurrence Stevens (in judgment) Kennedy took
Watson v. Fort Worth Bank & Trust
Watson_v._Fort_Worth_Bank_&_Trust
2014 United States Supreme Court case
opinions Majority Kagan, joined by Roberts, Kennedy, Breyer, Sotomayor Concurrence Sotomayor Dissent Scalia Dissent Thomas, joined by Scalia, Ginsburg,
Michigan v. Bay Mills Indian Community
Michigan_v._Bay_Mills_Indian_Community
2024 United States Supreme Court case
necessary". Justice Clarence Thomas wrote a concurrence in judgment only, similar to Jackson's concurrence in judgement, and echoing Barrett's concern
Moody_v._NetChoice,_LLC
1978 United States Supreme Court case
Stewart, joined by Burger, White, Blackmun, Powell, Rehnquist, Stevens Concurrence Marshall (in judgment), joined by Brennan Laws applied U.S. Const. amend
Califano_v._Aznavorian
American copyright lawsuit
found Koons's fair-use claim even stronger. Judge Robert Katzmann, in a concurrence, criticized the court for attempting to assert broader principles rather
Blanch_v._Koons
1967 meeting
Government (FMG) in the Supreme Military Council, making a unanimous concurrence imperative. It was agreed as well, that the Head of the Federal Military
Aburi_Accord
1999 United States Supreme Court case
information is determinative.” Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote a separate concurrence, joined by Justices Sandra Day O’Connor, David Souter, and Stephen Breyer
Los Angeles Police Department v. United Reporting Publishing Corp.
Los_Angeles_Police_Department_v._United_Reporting_Publishing_Corp.
1971 United States Supreme Court case
Harlan, joined by Burger, Stewart, Marshall, White, Blackmun Concurrence Douglas Concurrence Brennan Dissent Black Laws applied U.S. Const. Amend. XIV
Boddie_v._Connecticut
2020 United States Supreme Court case
Gorsuch, Kavanaugh; Thomas (Parts I, III, and IV) Concurrence Thomas (in part and in the judgment) Concurrence Alito (in part and in the judgment) Laws applied
Monasky_v._Taglieri
1977 United States Supreme Court case
compelling state interest-curtailing illegal drug use. Stewart qualified his concurrence by indicating he agreed with the majority's decision but that he agreed
Whalen_v._Roe
Parliamentary procedure
serves to moderate the power of one branch of government by requiring the concurrence of another branch for selected actions. The expression is frequently
Advice_and_consent
Most serious disciplinary action that can be taken against a Member
proceedings, punish its members for disorderly behavior, and with the concurrence of two-thirds, expel a member." The process for expulsion from the House
Expulsion from the United States Congress
Expulsion_from_the_United_States_Congress
2005 United States Supreme Court case
Anthony Kennedy David Souter · Clarence Thomas Ruth Bader Ginsburg · Stephen Breyer Case opinions Majority O'Connor, joined by unanimous Concurrence Scalia
Lockhart v. United States (2005)
Lockhart_v._United_States_(2005)
Image search enhancing tool
Google Image Swirl was an enhancement for an image-search tool in Google Labs. It was announced on the Google labs blog on November 17, 2009 with a limited
Google_Image_Swirl
President of the United States from 1961 to 1963
also could not be assured that the assault would be 100% effective. In concurrence with a majority vote of the NSC, Kennedy decided on a naval blockade
John_F._Kennedy
2023 United States Supreme Court case
Ketanji Brown Jackson Case opinions Majority Alito, joined by unanimous Concurrence Sotomayor, joined by Jackson Laws applied Title VII of the Civil Rights
Groff_v._DeJoy
Chatbot developed by Google
Google was fined €250 million by the competition regulator Autorité de la concurrence under the Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market, in part
Google_Gemini
French national television network
citing concerns from French antitrust regulator, the Autorité de la concurrence, regarding competition in the advertising sector; the combined entity
M6_(TV_channel)
1986 United States Supreme Court case
Blackmun, Stevens Plurality Brennan (Part IV–B), joined by White Concurrence White Concurrence O'Connor (in judgment), joined by Burger, Powell, Rehnquist
Thornburg_v._Gingles
1990 United States Supreme Court case
joined by Rehnquist, Brennan, White, Marshall, Stevens, O'Connor, Kennedy; Scalia (all but Part II) Concurrence Scalia Laws applied 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)
Taylor v. United States (1990)
Taylor_v._United_States_(1990)
2024 U.S. Supreme Court decision on presidential immunity
Adler wrote in support of the ruling, although he sided with Barrett's concurrence as opposed to Roberts's majority ruling. Adler argued that while presidential
Trump_v._United_States
2017 United States Supreme Court case
Roberts, Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor Concurrence Gorsuch (in part), joined by Thomas Concurrence Alito (in judgment) Laws applied 18 U.S.C. § 1425(a)
Maslenjak_v._United_States
2018 United States Supreme Court case
public rights managed by the Executive Branch. Justice Breyer filed a concurrence that was joined by Ginsburg and Sotomayor. While Breyer agreed in full
Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. Greene's Energy Group, LLC
Oil_States_Energy_Services,_LLC_v._Greene's_Energy_Group,_LLC
1966 United States Supreme Court case
the power to punish private conspiracies, Justice Clark, writing in concurrence, asserted that "there now can be no doubt that the specific language
United_States_v._Guest
2007 United States Supreme Court case
the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race. In concurrence with the majority opinion Justice Clarence Thomas restated his view,
Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1
Parents_Involved_in_Community_Schools_v._Seattle_School_District_No._1
1952 Supreme Court of the United States case on freedom of speech
acknowledging deportation may be “cruel”. Justice Felix Frankfurter wrote in concurrence with the majority opinion. His opinion focused on Congress holding the
Harisiades_v._Shaughnessy
2013 United States Supreme Court case
specific than the ATS. Justice Kennedy separately wrote a one-paragraph concurrence noting that the presumption against extraterritorial application "may
Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co.
Kiobel_v._Royal_Dutch_Petroleum_Co.
2024 United States Supreme Court case
opinions Majority Barrett, joined by Roberts, Thomas, Alito, Kavanaugh Concurrence Gorsuch (in judgment) Dissent Sotomayor, joined by Kagan, Jackson Laws
Department_of_State_v._Muñoz
2003 US Supreme Court gerrymandering case
Majority O'Connor, joined by Rehnquist, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas Concurrence Kennedy Concurrence Thomas Dissent Souter, joined by Stevens, Ginsburg, Breyer
Georgia_v._Ashcroft
1999 U.S. Supreme Court case
Majority Scalia, joined by Rehnquist, Kennedy, Thomas, Ginsburg Concurrence Thomas Concurrence Souter (in judgment), joined by Blackmun, Stevens, O'Connor
Heck_v._Humphrey
United States Supreme Court case
posed by another". The revised March 2 opinion included an expanded concurrence from Judge James C. Ho, arguing that "civil protective orders are too
United_States_v._Rahimi
2026 United States Supreme Court case
by Roberts, Thomas, Alito, Sotomayor, Kagan, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh Concurrence Jackson Laws applied Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 8; 28 U.S.C. §
Berk_v._Choy
1952 United States Supreme Court case
opinions Majority Burton, joined by Vinson, Reed, Jackson, Clark, Minton, Concurrence Black Dissent Douglas Frankfurter took no part in the consideration or
Public Utilities Commission of the District of Columbia v. Pollak
Public_Utilities_Commission_of_the_District_of_Columbia_v._Pollak
2010 United States Supreme Court case
commanded a majority of the Court as to all parts. Justice Stevens' concurrence, joined by Justices Ginsburg, Breyer, and Sotomayor, argues that the
Bilski_v._Kappos
Interstate Highway in Texas
county line for designation as I-69, which was to be signed as I-69E upon concurrence from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). FHWA approval for this
Interstate_69_in_Texas
benefits, as Justice Leroy Rountree Hassell, Sr. asserted in his dissent/concurrence. Kinser pointed out that the court had not granted review on that issue
Arlington_County_v._White
Freedom of religion court case in the Philippines
against the petitioners are hereby annulled and set aside. Concurrence Isagani Cruz Concurrence Teodoro R. Padilla Camilo Quiason and Hugo Gutierrez Jr.
Ebralinag v. Division Superintendent
Ebralinag_v._Division_Superintendent
October 2016 to October 2017 opinions
court's opinion Filed a concurrence Joined a concurrence Filed a dissent Joined a dissent Filed a concurrence/dissent Joined a concurrence/dissent Did not participate
2016 term opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States
2016_term_opinions_of_the_Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
1945 attacks in Japan during WWII
Union, at the upcoming Potsdam Conference, as this also required British concurrence. Orders for the attack were issued to General Carl Spaatz on 25 July
Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki
Atomic_bombings_of_Hiroshima_and_Nagasaki
2026 United States Supreme Court case
(parts I through IV–B) Plurality Jackson (part IV–C), joined by Roberts, Sotomayor, Kagan Concurrence Gorsuch Laws applied Blockburger v. United States
Barrett v. United States (2026)
Barrett_v._United_States_(2026)
Sotomayor 2024 term statistics 1 Majority or plurality 2 Concurrence 4 Other 0 Dissent 0 Concurrence/dissent Total = 7 Bench opinions = 3 Opinions relating
2024 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Sonia Sotomayor
2024_term_United_States_Supreme_Court_opinions_of_Sonia_Sotomayor
2023 United States Supreme Court case
for punishing true threats generally." Justice Gorsuch agreed to her concurrence in part. Justice Amy Coney Barrett dissented, writing that the decision
Counterman_v._Colorado
2018 United States Supreme Court case
in taxes that they could not collect. Following a statement made in a concurrence opinion by Justice Anthony Kennedy in a 2015 related case, which suggested
South_Dakota_v._Wayfair,_Inc.
1971 United States Supreme Court case
Lemon test could not resolve them.") The Concurrence from Gorsuch ("[Lemon was a] misadventure") The Concurrence from Thomas ("[I] would take the logical
Lemon_v._Kurtzman
United States Supreme Court case
opinions Majority Kavanaugh, joined by Roberts, Thomas, Alito, Barrett Concurrence Sotomayor, joined by Kagan, Jackson Gorsuch took no part in the consideration
Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. Eagle County
Seven_County_Infrastructure_Coalition_v._Eagle_County
1993 United States Supreme Court case
opinions Majority Rehnquist, joined by Stevens, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas Concurrence Stevens Dissent White, joined by Blackmun; Souter (except the footnote
Brecht_v._Abrahamson
Form of child abuse
Criminal law Elements Actus reus Mens rea Causation Concurrence Scope of criminal liability Accessory Accomplice Complicity Corporate Mandated reporter
Child_sexual_abuse
Policy on permits required to enter Thailand
established laws on investment promotion Type IM: to invest with the concurrence of the Thai ministries and governmental departments concerned Type M:
Visa_policy_of_Thailand
October 2020 to October 2021 opinions
court's opinion Filed a concurrence Joined a concurrence Filed a dissent Joined a dissent Filed a concurrence/dissent Joined a concurrence/dissent Filed a statement
2020 term opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States
2020_term_opinions_of_the_Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
Medical condition
Saint's triad is a medical condition of concurrence of the following: Cholelithiasis (gallstones) Hiatal hernia Diverticular disease (diverticulosis of
Saint's_triad
1996 United States Supreme Court case
percent to 50.9 percent. In an unusual move, Justice O'Connor wrote a concurrence to her own opinion in which she expressed her view on two points: first
Bush_v._Vera
1978 United States Supreme Court case
Stevens Case opinions Majority Stevens, joined by Stewart, White, Powell Concurrence Blackmun (concurring in opinion in part IV only, concurring in judgment)
City of Los Angeles Department of Water & Power v. Manhart
City_of_Los_Angeles_Department_of_Water_&_Power_v._Manhart
CONCURRENCE
CONCURRENCE
CONCURRENCE
Boy/Male
Bengali, Gujarati, Hindu, Indian, Kannada, Malayalam, Marathi, Telugu
The Truth
Boy/Male
Muslim
Beautiful, Handsome
Girl/Female
Christian, Gujarati, Hindu, Indian, Kannada, Malayalam, Marathi, Sindhi, Telugu
Attractive
Boy/Male
Indian
Medium
Surname or Lastname
English
English : variant of Dayman, an occupational name for a herdsman or dairyman (see Day). It was also used as a personal name.
Boy/Male
Arabic, Muslim
Another Name for God; Talented; Apt; Enough
Boy/Male
American, Anglo, Australian, British, Chinese, Christian, Dutch, English, French, German, Irish, Norse, Teutonic
Mighty with a Spear; Strong Spear; Powerful with the Spear
Girl/Female
Hindu, Indian, Traditional
Goddess Parvati
Girl/Female
Muslim/Islamic
Clever Intelligent
Boy/Male
Tamil
Wealthy
CONCURRENCE
CONCURRENCE
CONCURRENCE
CONCURRENCE
CONCURRENCE
n.
Concurrence; conjunction; combination; association; union.
n.
The concurrence of events in time; synchronism.
n.
Voluntary accordance with, or concurrence in, what is done or proposed by another; acquiescence; compliance; approval; permission.
n.
Concurrence.
n.
An uncouth or disagreable sound of words, owing to the concurrence of harsh letters or syllables.
n.
Agreement or concurrence for some end or purpose; conspiracy.
a.
Private knowledge; joint knowledge with another of a private concern; cognizance implying consent or concurrence.
n.
A point of time; esp., one made critical or important by a concurrence of circumstances; hence, a crisis; an exigency.
n.
Act of concurring; coincidence; concurrence.
a.
Growing out of, or depending on, custom or tacit agreement; sanctioned by general concurrence or usage; formal.
n.
The concurrence of events in time; simultaneousness.
n.
The concurrence of two vowels in two successive words or syllables.
a.
Of or pertaining to symptoms; happening in concurrence with something; being a symptom; indicating the existence of something else.
n.
A concurrence of three waves.
n.
The state or quality of being concurrent; concurrence.
n.
Concurrence of starry position or influence; hence, similarity of condition, fortune, etc., as prefigured by astrological calculation.
v. i.
General agreement or concurrence; arbitrary custom; usage; conventionality.
n.
A common right; coincidence of equal powers; as, a concurrence of jurisdiction in two different courts.
n.
The act of synchronizing; concurrence of events in respect to time.
n.
Capable, deliberate, and voluntary assent or agreement to, or concurrence in, some act or purpose, implying physical and mental power and free action.